External Consultants & Freelancers vs Permanent Employees: Cost Comparison Explained

When companies compare external consultants with permanent employees, the discussion often starts and ends with one simple question: who is cheaper? At first glance, the answer may seem obvious. A permanent employee’s monthly salary usually appears significantly lower than a consultant’s daily rate. However, this comparison overlooks a critical point: salary and daily rate are not the same as total cost. To make a well-informed decision, organizations need to look beyond surface numbers and understand the real cost difference between external consultants and permanent employees, including indirect costs, productivity, flexibility, and risk.

Reading time: 5 min

Salary vs daily rate: the visible cost difference

The most common comparison is straightforward:

  • a permanent employee is evaluated based on monthly or annual salary
  • an external consultant is evaluated based on a daily or hourly rate

When viewed this way, consultants almost always seem more expensive. A consultant’s daily rate multiplied over a year can easily exceed an employee’s gross salary.

However, this approach compares two very different cost structures. While salary is only one component of an employee’s total cost, a consultant’s rate typically includes costs and risks that are handled separately for permanent staff.

The real cost of a permanent employee

Salary is only the starting point

A permanent employee’s gross salary is only one part of what a company actually pays. Beyond salary, companies typically cover employer-side costs such as social contributions, benefits, and other employment-related overheads. This is why comparing salary vs daily rate on its own often creates an incomplete picture.

Paid time that is not productive time

Permanent employees are paid regardless of whether they are actively producing output. This includes:

  • vacation days
  • public holidays
  • sick leave
  • training and internal meetings

While these elements are essential and expected, they still represent paid time without direct project output, which increases the effective cost per productive day.

Hiring, onboarding, and ramp-up

Recruiting a permanent employee comes with additional costs that are often underestimated:

  • recruitment agency fees or internal hiring costs
  • time spent by managers and teams on interviews
  • onboarding and training
  • reduced productivity during the first months

It is not uncommon for a new hire to take three to six months before reaching full productivity.

Long-term financial commitment and risk

A permanent employee represents a fixed, long-term cost. Even when workloads fluctuate, the cost remains the same. This can lead to:

  • underutilization during slower periods
  • restructuring or termination costs if priorities change
  • limited flexibility to adjust skills quickly

From a financial perspective, this long-term commitment is one of the most significant hidden costs.

This becomes clearer when looking at actual labour cost data.

Reality check: labour costs go beyond salary (Eurostat)

A useful way to think about the full employer-side cost is hourly labour cost, which includes wages and salaries plus non-wage costs such as employers’ social contributions.

According to Eurostat’s Hourly labour costs figures for 2024, average hourly labour costs were €33.5 in the EU and €37.3 in the euro area, with large differences between countries,  from €10.6/hour in Bulgaria up to €55.2/hour in Luxembourg (Belgium: €48.2/hour).

Eurostat also highlights that non-wage costs make up a meaningful share of total labour costs: 24.7% in the EU (and 25.5% in the euro area) on average, and much higher in some countries (e.g., France 32.2%, Sweden 31.6%).

Source: Eurostat

What this means in practice: employer contributions can materially change the true cost of an internal hire, depending on the country.

A consultant’s day rate may look higher than a salary, but total cost depends on hidden employee costs, productivity time, and how much flexibility you need.

The cost structure of external consultants and freelancers

Higher daily rates, fewer additional costs

External consultants typically charge higher daily rates, but these rates usually include:

  • taxes and social contributions
  • benefits and insurance
  • periods without work between projects

For the company, this typically means no additional employer costs on top of the agreed rate.

Paying for productivity

One of the main financial advantages of consultants is that companies pay only for:

  • actual working days
  • defined project periods
  • specific deliverables

There is no payment for vacation, sick leave, or downtime between assignments. In addition, consultants are often expected to contribute value from day one, reducing ramp-up time.

Flexibility as a cost factor

Flexibility is not just an operational advantage, it also has a financial impact. External consultants allow companies to:

  • scale teams up or down quickly
  • access specialized expertise when needed
  • avoid long-term financial commitments

This flexibility reduces risk, especially in uncertain or fast-changing environments.

Reality check: typical market rates in Belgium

External consultants and freelancers are usually priced via hourly or daily rates, and those rates vary by seniority, specialization, and contract setup. As a practical benchmark for Belgium, according to Freelancers in Belgium the hourly rates commonly fall in the €50–€150 range (with €70–€99 most common), with an average hourly rate of €84. They also report that day rates often range from €400 to €1000, with an approximate average day rate of €710.

Rates tend to increase with freelance experience: starters (active for less than one year) typically charge around €71/hour, while senior freelancers (7+ years active) average closer to €90/hour, with corresponding day rates rising from approximately €650/day to €780/day.

Source: Freelancers in Belgium


For a second reference point, UNIZO’s Freelancer Focus is often summarized as placing many freelance hourly rates in the €50–€90 band, depending on the type of assignment.

Source: UNIZO

Why this matters in a cost comparison: these rates can look high next to payroll salary, but companies typically pay them only for productive project time and without employer-side extras (e.g., social contributions, paid leave, long-term employment commitment). That’s why the “real cost difference” depends on utilization, duration, and risk, not just the headline rate.

Comparison: Connecting-Expertise vs SAP Fieldglass, Nétive, proUnity
Criteria Connecting-Expertise SAP Fieldglass Nétive proUnity
EU compliance & local alignment Strong EU focus, local purchasing and labor alignment Global standardization first, EU via integrations Benelux strength, EU aligned Benelux focus, EU aligned
Neutral platform (no forced ecosystem) Independent of SAP or HR suite Part of SAP ecosystem Independent Independent
Configurability High (over 8,000 options), modular flows High but heavier to tune Configurable mid-market focus Configurable marketplace model
Speed to value (mid-market) Fast deployment, direct support Slower enterprise cycles Fast Fast
Best fit EU-centric organizations needing speed, flexibility and local precision Large global enterprises standardizing on SAP Benelux and EU mid-market Benelux marketplace-driven sourcing


When a permanent employee is more cost-effective

Despite the advantages of consultants, permanent employees can be the better choice in certain situations, such as:

  • roles with a stable, long-term workload
  • positions that require deep company-specific knowledge
  • junior or mid-level roles where long-term development is planned
  • core functions central to company culture and continuity

In these cases, the long-term investment in an employee can outweigh the flexibility of external support.

When external consultants make more financial sense

External consultants are often the more cost-effective option when:

  • expertise is needed for a limited period
  • projects require highly specialized skills
  • time-to-delivery is critical
  • future workload is uncertain
  • internal teams lack capacity or specific experience

In these scenarios, the higher daily rate is often offset by faster results, lower risk, and greater flexibility.

Conclusion: cost is more than a number

Comparing external consultants with permanent employees purely on salary or daily rate leads to incomplete conclusions. The real cost difference lies in total cost of ownership, which includes productivity, flexibility, and financial risk.

Rather than asking which option is cheaper, companies benefit more from asking:

Which cost structure best fits our current needs and future uncertainty?

The most effective organizations understand that cost is not just a number, it is a strategic decision.

A final practical consideration

For companies that decide to work with external consultants or freelancers, cost is only one part of the equation. Visibility, compliance, and control over external talent can also influence long-term effectiveness.

Many organizations therefore choose to manage external talent through a Vendor Management System (VMS), which helps centralize contracts, rates, and external workforce data across teams.

If external expertise plays a growing role in your organization, having the right structure in place can be just as important as choosing the right cost model.

Discover Success Stories

ORES's Advancement in Modernizing Procurement with a Comprehensive VMS Solution
By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.